For comparison, in that same restaurant is Fredbear. The sophistication of the Security Puppet, especially since it wasn't possessed, is quite mind-boggling. It clearly has no strings attached-they would have stopped it from going outside to search. Why not have it stop any child wearing any bracelet from reaching the exit? It only keeps watching over a single child. Now let's combine this with the fact that Security Puppet is kinda a flawed concept in general: Almost as if the whole concept of the Security Puppet.isn't actually as true as we thought. Why would Scott deliberately leave out such an important detail? The entire conflict, the very reason why The Security Puppet couldn't get to her in time is GONE! Not only is there a third child, but most condemningly THERE IS NOTHING ON THE PUPPET'S BOX! It takes more effort for Scott to alter the scene rather than just remove the scanlines from the original image. Now let's play spot the difference! Įvery other shot in Henry's video is perfectly accurate to the games in question. Puppet can't intervene because Puppet had a box put on top of its box, trapping it inside. The premise is simple: 3 children have locked Henry's daughter outside. Take a look at the security puppet minigame again: This isn't wishful thinking, I have solid evidence that this is the case:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |